Appraisal Economics has determined the fair market value of minority, non-controlling interests in various companies under common ownership engaged in construction management, construction material manufacture, and construction equipment rental in the Mid-Atlantic region. We determined the business enterprise value and the corresponding equity value of each company using the capitalization of earnings method of the income approach and the guideline transaction method of the market approach. Key issues included normalized levels of contract revenue, given the wide year-to-year fluctuations, as well as appropriate owners’ compensation for each entity, given that each of the owners rendered services in a variety of capacities to all of the companies. As part of our analysis, we made adjustments to the pro rata values of the subject interests to account for their lack of control and lack of marketability.

Please click for more information about our valuations of companies and our work for gift and estate tax purposes.

Appraisal Economics Inc. has valued the intangible assets of a first aid supplies manufacturer that designs, produces, and distributes burn dressings and other wound care products to first responders, militaries, and providers of industrial and consumer first aid kits around the world. The company was acquired by a private equity firm. Products include burn gels, burn dressings, fire blankets, burn care blankets, antiseptic and antibacterial sprays, creams, and ointments, hydrocortisone-based anti-itch products and other related products. Appraisal Economics valued the trademarks, trade names, patents, and unpatented proprietary technology and manufacturing processes. Typically, customer-related assets are recognized and valued separate from goodwill; however, the company has elected the private company alternative under Accounting Standards Update No. 2014–18.

Please click for more information about purchase price allocations and the valuation of intangible assets and intellectual property.

Appraisal Economics Inc. has tested for, and determined the amount of, goodwill impairment for each reporting unit of a publicly traded company for ASC 350. We considered the market capitalization of the common equity. We also valued the preferred equity held by a private equity fund, which included a liquidation preference and a conversion feature. We performed a discounted cash flow analysis for each reporting unit and the publicly traded parent company. Once we concluded the fair value of each reporting unit, we compared each reporting unit’s fair value to its book value. For the reporting unit that we determined was impaired, we appraised and subtracted the fair value of these assets from its enterprise value. The difference is the fair value of goodwill, and the amount by which the goodwill’s fair value was less than its carrying value was the amount of goodwill impairment.

With the issuance of Accounting Standards Update 2017–04 in January 2017, as early as January 2017 and no later than 2020, “Step 2” has been eliminated and goodwill impairment will be calculated as the excess of the reporting unit’s carrying value over the reporting unit’s fair value. This eliminates the need to value all of the company’s assets as though there were a business combination on the testing date, reducing the complexity and compliance costs associated with ASC 350.

Please click for more information about goodwill impairment and the IP valuation and intangible asset valuation.

Appraisal Economics Inc. has valued a globally recognized premium paper manufacturer. The company produces and distributes coated and uncoated paper products that are used for stationary, photo books, and high-end brochures and catalogues. The company has produced the official stationary used by several U.S. Presidents, the White House, and the Department of Defense, which awards paper certificates in conjunction with military honors including the Congressional Medal of Honor. We determined the business enterprise value of the company using the discounted cash flow method of the income approach and the guideline transaction and guideline company methods of the market approach. Then, using various quantitative methods, we determined appropriate discounts for lack of control and lack of marketability and applied these discounts to the company’s per share value. The results of our analysis were used for estate planning purposes.

Please click for more information about valuations of companies, the paper industry, and our work for tax purposes.

Appraisal Economics Inc. has performed a valuation analysis of a U.S. major league sports team and its related regional sports network. As part of our analysis, we also determined the value of derivative interests in various entities that own the team and network. Our valuation included the discounted cash flow method of the income approach and elements of the market approach, including the application of market multiples. We also determined the value of preferred securities associated with the aforementioned entities, based on a full credit analysis and examination of prevailing market interest rates for similar securities. Finally, we determined appropriate minority discounts and discounts for lack of marketability.

Please click for more information about sports franchise valuations and the valuation of complex securities.

Appraisal Economics Inc. has determined the value of the “embedded derivative” in convertible preferred securities issued by the operating partnership of a large publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT). The preferred securities receive quarterly dividend payments and also contain an embedded derivative to convert into shares of the publicly traded REIT’s common stock, which is effectively a call option. We determined the fair value of the embedded derivative using binomial models and a “with and without” valuation method. We used a binomial model to determine the fair value of the aggregate preferred security and a second binomial model to determine the value of the preferred assuming that it was not convertible into common stock. The value of the embedded derivative is the difference in value indicated by the two models.

Please click for more information about the valuation of complex securities.

Appraisal Economics has valued a portfolio of patents and patent applications used to manufacture photovoltaic cells in the solar power industry. The portfolio was transferred as part of a legal settlement between two U.S.-based chemical companies that operate in China. One of the companies had developed a patented process for printing hot melt ink onto the substrate of a silicon wafer to manufacture solar cells. The other company developed similar procedures for manufacturing solar cells. Upon being made aware of the existence of the patented procedure, the second party filed a motion with the Chinese Patent Re-examination Board (CPRB) to invalidate the pre-existing patent. The CPRB rejected the request, upon which an agreement was reached to compensate the first party for patent infringement. The settlement called for valuing the patent portfolio, which was performed by Appraisal Economics.

Please click for more information about valuing patents.

Appraisal Economics has performed a transfer pricing analysis related to the transfer of intellectual property (IP) assets to an offshore holding company set up by a U.S.-based global media company. The transfer was part of a restructuring transaction designed to broaden the company’s product offerings of print and digital media and expand licensing opportunities for the company’s trademarks and logo. Section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code requires that royalty payments between related parties in different countries be set at arm’s length terms. This is intended to prevent opportunistically recognizing revenue, expenses, and profits in a way that results in taxable income being improperly shifted to lower-tax jurisdictions and evading U.S. taxes. The transaction was also required to comply with Section 367(d) of the Internal Revenue Code, which governs certain terms of cross-border reorganizations. Appraisal Economics performed a detailed analysis to determine the arm’s length royalties between the entities and determined the business enterprise value of each entity to support company management’s efforts to demonstrate compliance with the provisions of the relevant regulations.

Please click for more information about transfer pricing.

Appraisal Economics has valued a business in the process of being sold. We performed an analysis of the appropriate discount from a proposed transaction price to account for the time and uncertainty associated with the transaction being consummated as proposed, often referred to as “merger arbitrage.” A potential acquirer submitted a letter of intent to purchase a privately held company; however, there was substantial uncertainty whether the transaction would actually occur and, if so, what the ultimate price and terms would be after due diligence and final negotiations. Another consideration is how long shareholders of the target company would have to wait to realize the proceeds from a sale. To determine the fair market value of the company being sold shortly after the target company received a letter of intent, we performed research and analysis to determine the appropriate discount from the proposed transaction price. Appraisal Economics valued the subject interest for gift and estate tax planning purposes.

Please click for more information about mergers and acquisitions, and gift and estate tax planning.

Appraisal Economics has valued non-compete agreements (NCAs or covenants not to compete) of senior executives of a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that merged with another public REIT. As part of the merger, certain executive officers entered into covenants not to compete with the merged entity during, and for a period of time after, their employment. Section 280G and Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code relate to excess parachute payments upon certain corporate events, such as a change in control. Amounts that executives receive in exchange for committing to perform and abstain from certain activities specified in the NCAs are generally taxed at lower rates than amounts considered to be “golden parachutes”; however, only amounts that are “reasonable compensation” qualify for this favorable treatment. Appraisal Economics valued each NCA as part of our Section 280G analysis to determine the reasonable compensation of each executive.

Please click for more information about tax reporting, mergers and acquisitions, and intangible assets such as non-compete agreements.